Rethinking Fairness: An Interdisciplinary Survey of Critiques of Hegemonic ML Fairness Approaches

نویسندگان

چکیده

This survey article assesses and compares existing critiques of current fairness-enhancing technical interventions into machine learning (ML) that draw from a range non-computing disciplines, including philosophy, feminist studies, critical race ethnic legal anthropology, science technology studies. It bridges epistemic divides in order to offer an interdisciplinary understanding the possibilities limits hegemonic computational approaches ML fairness for producing just outcomes society's most marginalized. The is organized according nine major themes critique wherein these different fields intersect: 1) how "fairness" AI research gets defined; 2) problems systems address get formulated; 3) impacts abstraction on tools function its propensity lead technological solutionism; 4) racial classification operates within research; 5) use measures avoid regulation engage ethics washing; 6) absence participatory design democratic deliberation considerations; 7) data collection practices entrench "bias," are non-consensual, lack transparency; 8) predatory inclusion marginalized groups systems; 9) engagement with AI's long-term social ethical outcomes. Drawing critiques, concludes by imagining future directions actively disrupt entrenched power dynamics structural injustices society.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Fairness: a survey

In this paper I provide an excursus, as complete as I could, of the most important theoretical and experimental works concerning fairness. The aim is twofold. First of all, I want to underline the importance of the role played by experimental economics in testing and improving models on this topic. Secondly, I want to mention some evidence that, even for fair-minded people, economic factors suc...

متن کامل

Analysing the Fairness of Fairness-aware Classifiers

Calders and Verwer’s two-naive-Bayes is one of fairness-aware classifiers, which classify objects while excluding the influence of a specific information. We analyze why this classifier achieves very high level of the fairness, and show that this is due to a decision rules and a model bias. Based on these findings, we develop methods that are grounded on rigid theory and are applicable to wider...

متن کامل

An Axiomatic Theory of Fairness

The tradeoff between fairness and throughput has been widely observed in network analysis and protocol design. Despite many existing fairness metrics (from simple ones like Jain’s index to more complex ones like α-fair utility), the meaning of fairness is largely based on problemoriented interpretations and judgments, with no well-established framework. To tackle this challenging problem, we pr...

متن کامل

A queueing analysis of max-min fairness, proportional fairness and balanced fairness

We compare the performance of three usual allocations, namely max-min fairness, proportional fairness and balanced fairness, in a communication network whose resources are shared by a random number of data flows. The model consists of a network of processorsharing queues. The vector of service rates, which is constrained by some compact, convex capacity set representing the network resources, i...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['1076-9757', '1943-5037']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.13196